By Any Media Necessary: Mapping Youth and Participatory Politics

“It’s Called ‘Giving a Shit!’”

A panel on participatory politics, hosted by the Futures of Entertainment conference at MIT in November, 2012, brought together representatives from several of our case study organizations. But, when asked if they identified as activists, each participant distanced themselves from this category. Bassam Tariq of the 30 Mosques project thought it was “awful” that political categories were imposed upon Muslim cultural, social, and religious practices; his project hoped to “stay away” from politics in order to focus on “universals,” things everyone can “relate to,” and ideas which are “more open-ended” rather than “imposing an agenda.” Dorian Electra, whose music videos have been widely embraced by Students for Liberty, argued that “being too politicized” might distract from the educational and entertainment value of her work. The Harry Potter Alliance’s Lauren Bird acknowledged that her group, while nonprofit and thus nonpartisan, was involved in a range of political issues, but she stressed that members might have widely divergent perspectives and that ultimately the group was “more on the side of human rights” rather than a particular political “ideology.”

Meanwhile, the audience, mostly representing a slightly older generation, were expressing, via Twitter, their dissatisfaction with what they characterized as a “blacklash” against activism or a denial of the political stakes of these young people’s public expression. One audience member summed up the collective response, “On the semantics front, It’s not called ‘activism.’ It’s called ‘giving a shit.’”

By Any Media Necessary has made the case that what we are calling “participatory politics” constitutes a legitimate and valuable contribution to public culture. Peter Dahlgren has discussed political participation in terms of Trajectories, Modalities, Motivation, Sociality, and Visibility -­-­ and we will be using these concepts in this closing section to summarize some of the key insights we’ve developed through this book’s multiple case studies. Under Trajectories, we will explore the interplay we’ve discussed between audiences and publics, between popular culture, civil society, and institutional politics. We focus on the process by which young people enter into the political realm and acquire knowledge they will need to act meaningfully in civic life. Under modalities, we consider the ways that these groups produce and share content across a range of different media platforms and social locations, from the hyperlocal (their schools) to the transnational (NGOs and human rights organizations). In terms of motivation, we explore the models of personal and social change informing these movements, including what we’ve discussed here as content worlds and mobilizing structures. In terms of sociality, we will discuss the ways political participation fits within young people’s social and cultural lives, becomes part of what they talk about when they are together and part of what solidifies their involvement in interest-based and friendship-based networks. And in terms of visibility, we will discuss the ways their tactics accelerate the circulation of information through diverse publics and the ways that such pushes to shift public attention may also place these precarious publics at greater risk.

Media Referenced in Chapter 7

This page has paths:

Contents of this tag:

This page references: